Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 |
101. [Mandate] Killmails Must Die - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Oh, I do understand very well, Anna. You are proud of your killboard stats and do not want others to feel the same. Not supported. if that was case and if killmails were removed, there would be no killboard...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.24 15:12:00
|
102. [Mandate] Killmails Must Die - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Not going to happen. You only think you have the higher moral ground, but you have no ground at all, because you are not making sense. It is all just hot air. Do you have a killboard record at all, before you as...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.24 14:38:00
|
103. [Mandate] Killmails Must Die - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Ohh yes, morals is all this is about. You question the moral behind killing for kill board stats and you choose to see it as immoral. The consequence of this will be that killing itself is morally right, while ki...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.24 14:26:00
|
104. [Proposal] Have scram/disruptor prevent jumping - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
so u're crying because your gate camp can't kill easy prey? u know what would be more fun? rather than sitting in one place, roam. or r u too scared of running into someone who will shoot back? what's next? u want them to remove your lossmails? --...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.24 01:57:00
|
105. [Mandate] Killmails Must Die - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Whitehound Are you trying to give killing a moral purpose by saying that kill mails are immoral? morals have nothing to do with this. it's because of killboards that everyone is faced with the dilemma of "wait hours for ...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.24 01:35:00
|
106. [Mandate] Killmails Must Die - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Commoner Errrrmmm no....our applicants must demonstrate a real ability, an arranged 1v1 proves nothing, and does not tell if the pilot has common sense, and is clever. We require a track record, where the pilot has killed a...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.23 21:34:00
|
107. [Mandate] Killmails Must Die - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Anna Lifera on 23/01/2011 06:33:26 Originally by: Brutus B You may have a point, but you may not. Overall, I don't support it. The real factor in eve pvp is isk-damage. At the end of the day, you could delete all the killm...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.23 06:31:00
|
108. overview problem - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Anna Lifera on 10/01/2011 23:05:08 the stupid glitch of fw targets appearing neutral existed for a long time and as far as i know, it was never fixed. be especially careful whenever u're in a high sec system bordering low sec 'cause...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.10 23:04:00
|
109. [Proposal] Revoke concord protection for highsec suicide gankers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Goose99 The whole point of this is to not stop it completely, but adding a degree of risk so that not everyone and their mother is doing it. Stopping it would've been easy, they can just destroy all mods on ship destruction...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.09 14:20:00
|
110. Cloaking Devices - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
aww but pirate tears r so delicious! --- You're an asset to the community Anna. Thank you for your clear concise remarks. - Draek
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.08 17:21:00
|
111. Cloaking Devices - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Anna Lifera on 08/01/2011 16:45:02 Originally by: Aero089 Hey Anna, Please come to the Great Wildlands, have a fly around. Try to catch something. Report your findings, okay? Nullsec is supposed to be risky, needs to be de...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.08 16:37:00
|
112. Cloaking Devices - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Aero089 @Anna, I'll admit I'm terrible at soloing. I'll say it out in the open; if anyone is likely to screw up in a fleet, it'll be me. Still, I'm the one that actually plays in nullsec and thus encounters this **** on a r...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.08 15:57:00
|
113. [Proposal] Revoke concord protection for highsec suicide gankers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: nugget906 You don't need to be defensive. No justification is necessary, the fact that it can be done is enough in itself and it's all that matters. The problem is that it destroys the market for deadspace mods. This is cau...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.08 05:06:00
|
114. Cloaking Devices - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Anna Lifera on 08/01/2011 04:26:58 Originally by: Aero089 Anna, you have killboard stats... In highsec killing Mackinaws. The only nullsec experience you've had is in a bomber, bombing the PF- gate. So Anna, where do you g...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.08 04:24:00
|
115. Cloaking Devices - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Edited by: Anna Lifera on 07/01/2011 14:20:52 Originally by: Aero089 It's very freakin' easy. It's very freakin' easy. Do you really think that all gates are camped 23/7? nevertheless, they still face more risk for a lot less rewa...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.07 14:17:00
|
116. [Proposal] Remove Clone Costs - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
apparently, it's not enough for vets to have a total sp advantage over newbies, in experience, dps, tanking, ewar, and ship/mod options too. for some stupid reason, they think they're entitled to be pampered in eve. news flash--there's no newbie h...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2011.01.07 00:14:00
|
117. [Proposal] Alt Posting - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
supported. it's not so much the automatic association of "buff me, nerf you" towards an affiliation, it's more of who's really behind the troll that ppl can find out to shut him up in-game. it's not like anyone can track your identity with your ma...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2010.12.29 23:56:00
|
118. [Proposal] Revoke concord protection for highsec suicide gankers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Guy LeDuche So basically you're against it because you're a ganker and want to keep concord protection? Too transparent. if by "protection" u mean getting insta-pwned when i do gank someone, then sure, it's fine. conv...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2010.12.28 02:31:00
|
119. [Proposal] Revoke concord protection for highsec suicide gankers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: Common Origin After a sucessful suicide gank, kill right on ganker extends to everyone, not just the victim. Suicide gankers are criminals, so why would Concord care if I shoot them? They ought to be fair game. This is no...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2010.12.28 02:18:00
|
120. [Proposal] Revoke concord protection for highsec suicide gankers - in Assembly Hall [original thread]
Originally by: EdFromHumanResources No see he wants other people's safety gone while safety is actually increased. He doesn't want a fair fight exactly. proposal's just a selfish whine 'cause of all these pathetic scared "pirates" who...
- by Anna Lifera - at 2010.12.28 02:05:00
|
Pages: 1 2 3 4 5 [6] 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |